Once upon a time I completed half of a low-residency MFA program which in reality more accurately resembled the Correspondence Writing Schools on the back of cereal packages. It was one of the best programs in the country. A lot of people liked it. It made me crazy, literally. The interpersonal dynamics among the staff was worse than any dysfunctional family I've treated in therapy. As if in proof, the director shot himself to death right after I left the program, broken and miserable with no one taking any responsibility for how I had been treated there leading up to being placed on academic probation. At first I complained to the deans of Bennington, but then I let it go. I did not have the emotional strength to stand up for myself and there was no point since I knew I would never go back. I had always succeeded academically. I had always been told I was a good writer. This was an untenable blow. It felt unrecoverable.
The main elements of the program was writing a book review a week and a story a month that would be mailed to a teacher for feedback. There were five residencies in the two years where you spent ten days attending seminars mostly presented by peers' theses, which included their fiction/non-fiction writing and a literary analysis. Teachers only presented once.
It was pretty boring. The social butterflies, as they always do, thrived. Certain of them had tables in the cafeteria that were theirs and you could only sit there by invitation. I mostly chose a corner table all by myself or with another loner who didn't make me feel pressured to talk. I ate ice cream every day.
I had always thought an MFA would be validating and cool to have. Earlier in life, when I was an art history major and then attended art classes in New York City, my goal was to attend the MFA program in painting at Yale. But then I got more practical and through additional classes and research assistant jobs, I prepared myself for graduate school in psychology and went to Harvard for a Ph.D. It was a kind of dream come true in terms of intellectual validation. Actually, it was a dream I had never dared to have. I thought you had to be much smarter than me to get into Harvard. Most of the graduate students went around pinching ourselves, all but the most conceited. I feel incredibly lucky for that opportunity.
But about ten years ago I started itching again for an MFA, this time in writing. I was feeling bored with my work as a psychologist and felt I was still an artist at heart. Of course being a therapist is more art than science, and fulfills that need to some extent. But my eldest was leaving for college in Chicago and I felt bereft and in need of something to fill the gap.
That particular program was recommended by a writing teacher and was also easy to drive to, only two hours away. My induction to the dynamics of the program was the orientation, where the soon-to-be-dead director mocked me for mentioning Harvard in my introduction to the group. I felt humiliated, only to discover later that he had some minor Harvard masters degree that he would bring up whenever possible. My Ph.D. trumped him and he couldn't tolerate it.
There were other crazy things about the program. The two teachers I had never spoke to each other and merely criticized each other. They were both so narcissistic that I learned nothing from them. They had completely different policies about what was acceptable according to the "school," policies that were written down nowhere and completely opposite from each other.
After two semesters in the program I had the most serious bipolar episode I have ever had, a mixed episode of severe, unrelenting depression and hypomanic agitation and insomnia. I was sick for months, of course as usual pulling it together to get to work but other than that not functioning at all. That's the thing about bipolar: although it is a biologically based illness, episodes can be triggered by stressful life events. I tried to apply for a sick leave, but the dean I spoke to refused, which is completely illegal as I was considered to have a "disability." But I was way too sick to advocate for myself. The suicide of the director that summer was a manifestation of the school's complete ignorance and denial about mental illness. In my opinion, he was bipolar, but of course I would think that. I will never really know.
During that period I discovered blogging and that's what eventually pulled me out of it. The freedom was exhilarating. I made a lot of mistakes, writing things that attracted really crazy and mean people, but I shut down blog after blog until I found a balance.
Right now I'm in a period of transition. I've been writing a lot of personal things, and I want to write more fiction, but I want a balance of both. And I want to try to publish and work more on my memoir/novel.
I wish I had more readers. It's incredibly validating getting helpful comments. I think you are supposed to comment more on other blogs for that, and right now I don't have the energy to go blog-hunting.
But regardless, however many readers I now have is still more than the number of readers in the MFA program, where only one teacher's opinions counted and two one-week seminars of peers in the course of the year. After I left the program, I took all the batches of student comments and dumped them, unread, in the trash. I couldn't stand any of their writing. I couldn't stand my teachers' writing for that matter. How was I to take their critiques seriously? I never had a sense of any of them as people the way I do with fellow bloggers. They all seemed extremely pretentious. They were less real to me than the bloggers I socialize with who are so much more helpful with my writing and more profound thinkers. The whole experience of the Low-Residency MFA Program was surreal. I'm left feeling very puzzled over how anyone gets anything out of one. Am I that different from other people?
12 comments:
I've never done an MFA, but I can imagine it's a different energy writing essays and stories with the intent of impressing snobby teachers and probably even snobbier students. Blogging in it's anonymity allows a certain level of transparency that is hard to find in other venues. There is a risk in that transparency as you pointed out in attracting the wrong sort of readership, but I think you have struck a marvelous balance here.
I too lament that I do not have more readers. Most of my posts go unremarked. But like you I have no energy (nor time) to go poking about the blog-o-sphere looking for interesting people that I hope will reciprocate readership after I become one of their followers, albeit I only comment on blogs I truly enjoy reading.
You might well enjoy this: my dear friend, Toni Lopopolo, is a literary agent, a role she took after having been editorial director at Macmillan and St. Martins. She is a gifted teacher, who runs a Skype-type workshop that meets on weekends. Her workshop is supportive as well as functional, dealing with mechanics, conventions, and the most effective deployment of the individual's ideas. I've told her about you. She can be reached at Lopopolobooks@aol.com. It's not academic, but a good many of her people become published authors.
Disclosure: She represents me.
I took the initial Famous Writer's School (or whatever it was called) diagnostic test when I was fairly young. An "editor" came to visit at my parents' house, where I lived at the time. He said I had scored highly but desperately needed guidance in what to DO with my natural aptitude. (I'm resisting putting a lot of those phrases in quotation marks, you understand.) And guess what would be the best source of that guidance???
The Missus doesn't have an MFA because the local university doesn't offer one (not in writing, anyway). But she does have an "MA in English, with a specialization in creative writing." I think from both her and my perspective, the answer to your "how anyone gets anything out of [such a program]" question tends to be: they primarily get entrée to a community. It doesn't help the writing per se, although of course one's writing can benefit from exposure to the community: it IS possible to learn valuable stuff from (good) critiques. But mostly, it's meant to put the participants in a (more or less) comfortable spot, a spot where they can write safely. Some people take up tai chi on their own, but most, I think, join up in some kind of group program...
MFAs are kinda like that, I think. (Some would argue: right down to the concerted movement. Needlessly cynical, though, I think.)
Sounds like YOU had a pretty ghastly experience. Sometimes it must seem to you that you're a natural crazy-person magnet. Which could be a valuable talent if you were actively seeking clients, of course... but not exactly a predictor of great happiness! :)
JES: The Bennington community when I was there revolved around the philosophy of the personality disordered director who committed suicide. Communication among faculty was poor. It was the luck of the draw. People who loved it had teachers they loved and stayed in touch with. I was not so fortunate. I don't think I attracted crazy people and I don't know why you'd say that. There was tremendous teaching incompetence. I was the crazy one. I tried to get the highest status teachers and they turned out to be highly self-centered. Others chose more supportive teachers. That's what I should have done. By the time I realized it, it was too late. The new director is someone who has a reputation for a steady, fair head and brilliant non-fiction writing. He is humble and humorous. I wish I'd waited and gone there when he was there, but it's too late for me to start again. In such a small program, the community created is a total reflection of the personality of the director.
Storm: I'm glad you think I've struck a good balance. It's a constant feeling of insecurity. Your blog is very intimate and special. Each post is very dense with meaning and provokes a lot of thought.
Shelly: This referral is so kind of you. I'm so flattered. I will definitely look her up.
Oh gosh, that was graceless of me. All I meant with the "crazy people" comment was -- well, it was meant jokingly, as a reference to some of the stories you've posted here about the supposedly "normal" people you've had to work with, who in fact evidenced personality disorders and destructive psychological tics of one kind or the other.
(Seriously, I apologize for that weird off-kilter remark.)
Thank you so much for the kind words. I enjoy everything you share here. Your moniker fits you well as you Squirrel away little tidbits into this cache of yours. It's a privelige to be able to share in it.
JES: Thanks. I'm just sensitive. I don't want to be perceived as paranoid. The only type of person I would say I attract is not crazy but likes to talk a lot, because I'm a good listener and natural therapist. I probably perceive more psychopathology in the world than the average person, but I don't think these people afflict me more than anyone else. Maybe I just complain about them more. But please keep commenting. It was just a matter of nuances.
Thanks, Storm. Yes, Squirrel feels more me than my real name.
I think all creative writing programs suffer to some extent because of the hugely subjective nature of the judging process. Even in arts criticism, there are certain specific qualities you are looking for, and ways of approaching novels, films, etc, that can be taught. And of course it is possible anywhere and at any time to come across a severely dysfunctional institution, and I'm really sorry that you did. I know this will sound hopelessly corny, but the real strength comes from believing in yourself, Squirrel. You don't need me or anyone else to tell you that you are an excellent writer. Confidence is the student's superpower - I've seen that over and over again at the university. Write what you absolutely must write, and know that the very imperative will lend a sparkling quality to your words. Truth, particularly emotional truth, is always compelling. (and you have masses of that)
Thanks, litlove. I agree confidence is essential, but sometimes it's hard to maintain. I'm glad my children are more confident than me. It's a parenting pleasure.
Post a Comment